User talk:Kator278: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Would you be willing to do edit work for the rest of the Wiki, rather than just the Majsoul page? ~~~~") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Editing work == | |||
Would you be willing to do edit work for the rest of the Wiki, rather than just the Majsoul page? [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 23:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC) | Would you be willing to do edit work for the rest of the Wiki, rather than just the Majsoul page? [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 23:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
: I already explained my main doubt in PM. Though in all words I'm not against of editing regular pages. Glad to have a try :) --[[User:Kator278|Kator278]] ([[User talk:Kator278|talk]]) 04:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Ippatsu == | |||
Aren't there other cases of shouminkan not nullifying ippatsu besides chankan? For example, ippatsu tsumo. So I'm not sure changing shouminkan to chankan is correct there. --[[User:Bobland|Bobland]] ([[User talk:Bobland|talk]]) 19:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
: Any valid melding operation will nullify ippatsu. In this case, as long as an added kan (shouminkan) is passed, ippatsu will be cancelled as still. The issue of the previous wording is that, it raised up a confusion to make readers suppose shouminkan is an exception and would not cancel ippatsu, and apparently this is incorrect. --[[User:Kator278|Kator278]] ([[User talk:Kator278|talk]]) 04:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:31, 4 June 2019
Editing work
Would you be willing to do edit work for the rest of the Wiki, rather than just the Majsoul page? KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 23:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
- I already explained my main doubt in PM. Though in all words I'm not against of editing regular pages. Glad to have a try :) --Kator278 (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Ippatsu
Aren't there other cases of shouminkan not nullifying ippatsu besides chankan? For example, ippatsu tsumo. So I'm not sure changing shouminkan to chankan is correct there. --Bobland (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Any valid melding operation will nullify ippatsu. In this case, as long as an added kan (shouminkan) is passed, ippatsu will be cancelled as still. The issue of the previous wording is that, it raised up a confusion to make readers suppose shouminkan is an exception and would not cancel ippatsu, and apparently this is incorrect. --Kator278 (talk) 04:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)