User talk:Simon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(empty section > slight editing benefit) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Actually, it is standard Wikipedia practice to have all Categories placed at the bottom of the page. It just happened to be "External Links". It makes it convenient to separate them, in order to edit subsections above it. [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 14:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | Actually, it is standard Wikipedia practice to have all Categories placed at the bottom of the page. It just happened to be "External Links". It makes it convenient to separate them, in order to edit subsections above it. [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 14:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
Unified placement in the source is good practise, and I see the slight benefit of the empty section for editing, but an empty section simply looks ugly. :-/ Should still put categories at the end, but simply in the last nonempty section. [[User:Simon|Simon]] ([[User talk:Simon|talk]]) 16:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 16 October 2013
| Welcome to this Japanese Mahjong Wiki, Simon. |
 Japanese mahjong is a fairly complex game, with a high learning curve requiring a tremendous amount of knowledge to play. The learning curve is long, and the game complexity is deep. If you're someone curious enough to learn the game or aspire to be some kind of mahjong pro, then perhaps this wiki may help you in your game development. Regardless of your gameplay level, enjoy the material presented here; and more importantly, enjoy the game of Japanese mahjong. Here are some useful resources pertaining to this wiki:
If you can contribute to this Wiki, your help will be most appreciated. |
Just a little present, man. :3 KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 09:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
External links and Categories
Actually, it is standard Wikipedia practice to have all Categories placed at the bottom of the page. It just happened to be "External Links". It makes it convenient to separate them, in order to edit subsections above it. KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 14:45, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Unified placement in the source is good practise, and I see the slight benefit of the empty section for editing, but an empty section simply looks ugly. :-/ Should still put categories at the end, but simply in the last nonempty section. Simon (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)