Suji: Difference between revisions

Line 4:

==Basic Theory==

In short: a tile becomes safer against an opponent if they've discarded every tile that is an interval of 3 from that tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)

In short: a tile becomes safer against an opponent if they've discarded every tile (of the same suit) that is an interval of 3 from that tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)

The explanation is as follows:

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Basic Theory==
-In short: a tile becomes safer against an opponent if they've discarded every tile that is an interval of 3 from that tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)
+In short: a tile becomes safer against an opponent if they've discarded every tile (of the same suit) that is an interval of 3 from that tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)
 The explanation is as follows:

Navigation menu