Talk:Kan: Difference between revisions
(Kan procedure) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Kan on 1-pin is allowed, where the hand is interpreted with a shanpon of 3-pin and nan. This makes me wonder: what if the hand won with 3-pin without kan? This can either be viewed as a Tenhou.net house rule, flaw, or our error on this rule. [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 13:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | Kan on 1-pin is allowed, where the hand is interpreted with a shanpon of 3-pin and nan. This makes me wonder: what if the hand won with 3-pin without kan? This can either be viewed as a Tenhou.net house rule, flaw, or our error on this rule. [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 13:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
:It's a house rule. See [[Tenhou.net rules]]. [[User:Coppro|Coppro]] ([[User talk:Coppro|talk]]) 13:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | :It's a house rule. See [[Tenhou.net rules]]. [[User:Coppro|Coppro]] ([[User talk:Coppro|talk]]) 13:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
==Procedure== | |||
In my opinion, it would be less confusing to include the step where the kan dora is revealed in the procedure, using a "standard" rule. In the kan dora timing subsection, we can say that for a different rule, step 3 is moved to between step 5 and step 6 instead, for example. | |||
For the immediate reveal case, I believe the kan dora should be revealed after the chankan check. For the delayed reveal case, the reveal should happen right after the next discard or a kan call. --[[User:Benawii|Benawii]] ([[User talk:Benawii|talk]]) 01:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:42, 13 May 2017
Okurikan
Just a reminder to include this here. KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 21:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Kan during riichi: Some rethinking
Apparently for:
Kan on 1-pin is allowed, where the hand is interpreted with a shanpon of 3-pin and nan. This makes me wonder: what if the hand won with 3-pin without kan? This can either be viewed as a Tenhou.net house rule, flaw, or our error on this rule. KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 13:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- It's a house rule. See Tenhou.net rules. Coppro (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Procedure
In my opinion, it would be less confusing to include the step where the kan dora is revealed in the procedure, using a "standard" rule. In the kan dora timing subsection, we can say that for a different rule, step 3 is moved to between step 5 and step 6 instead, for example.
For the immediate reveal case, I believe the kan dora should be revealed after the chankan check. For the delayed reveal case, the reveal should happen right after the next discard or a kan call. --Benawii (talk) 01:42, 13 May 2017 (UTC)