1,883
edits
Sekinin barai: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Sekinin barai for suukantsu
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
: {{#mjt:3s}}, last: {{#mjt:44'44s}}, formers: {{#mjt:11'11s}} {{#mjt:6'666s}} {{#mjt:666'z}} | : {{#mjt:3s}}, last: {{#mjt:44'44s}}, formers: {{#mjt:11'11s}} {{#mjt:6'666s}} {{#mjt:666'z}} | ||
: Toimen doesn't become liable, | : Toimen doesn't become liable, the melding doesn't confirm a suukantsu, even with a possibility of hatsu kan afterwards. <ref group="note" name="note 1"> | ||
Tenhou used to suggest [http://tenhou.net/0/?log=20070224gm-000b-0000-6388336d&tw=3&ts=5 such controversal liability relationship] in early years. This rule was soon deprecated after then. | Tenhou used to suggest [http://tenhou.net/0/?log=20070224gm-000b-0000-6388336d&tw=3&ts=5 such controversal liability relationship] in early years. This rule was soon deprecated after then. | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
: Kamicha doesn't become liable, suukantsu is not completed yet at the moment when he discarded 2-pin. It was a pon of 2-pin and the hand is only a sankantsu, even though an added kan of 2-pin happens afterwards. | : Kamicha doesn't become liable, suukantsu is not completed yet at the moment when he discarded 2-pin. It was a pon of 2-pin and the hand is only a sankantsu, even though an added kan of 2-pin happens afterwards. | ||
Though such pao rule is not commonly used, as | Though such pao rule is not commonly used, as in fact it's hard for opponents to figure out which tile was exactly needed to complete suukantsu. That being said, even though the opponents clearly know they should prevent to feed a fourth kan by avoiding discarding raw unpaired tiles, this may still lead to a plenty of uncertain choices, while unlike the other yakumans they usually have specific alternatives and can be easily avoided. | ||
== Sekinin barai for rinshan kaihou == | == Sekinin barai for rinshan kaihou == | ||