1,758
edits
Suji: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Ura suji: clarify that discarded terminals aren't really applicable
m (fix musuji kanji, add examples to "not kanchans upgrading to ryanmen" for urasuji) |
m (→Ura suji: clarify that discarded terminals aren't really applicable) |
||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
According to ura suji: | According to ura suji: | ||
* | *Early discarded {{#mjt:4p}} makes {{#mjt:58p}} more dangerous. | ||
* | *Early discarded {{#mjt:6p}} makes {{#mjt:25p}} more dangerous. | ||
* | *Early discarded {{#mjt:5p}} makes {{#mjt:14p}} and {{#mjt:69p}} more dangerous. | ||
(Discarded 1/2/8/9 tiles are not particularly noteworthy, since these tiles are often discarded early anyways.) | |||
In the modern day, ura suji is often disregarded. If an opponent discards 5-pin early, then declares riichi, then non-suji 4-pin would be a dangerous tile. However, a non-suji 4-man, 5-man, 4-sou, etc. would also be dangerous tiles. Therefore, knowing about ura suji would not change your behavior. | In the modern day, ura suji is often disregarded. If an opponent discards 5-pin early, then declares riichi, then non-suji 4-pin would be a dangerous tile. However, a non-suji 4-man, 5-man, 4-sou, etc. would also be dangerous tiles. Therefore, knowing about ura suji would not change your behavior. | ||
| Line 114: | Line 116: | ||
*If you were attacking, you would discard ura suji anyways, because an ura suji is not that much more dangerous than a regular non-suji tile. | *If you were attacking, you would discard ura suji anyways, because an ura suji is not that much more dangerous than a regular non-suji tile. | ||
In addition, ura suji assumes your opponent is going for maximum [[tile efficiency]]. It also assumes that the 35 kanchan had existed in the first place. The 5-pin could have been an unrelated tile, or it could have been part of a 57 kanchan, or part of a 556 shape, or part of a 135 shape, and so on. | In addition, ura suji assumes your opponent is going for maximum [[tile efficiency]]. It also assumes that the 35 kanchan had existed in the first place. The 5-pin could have been an unrelated tile, or it could have been part of a 57 kanchan, or part of a completed 556 shape, or part of a completed 135 shape, and so on. | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||