Riichi: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
* '''Is it necessary to improve the hand by calling riichi?''' | * '''Is it necessary to improve the hand by calling riichi?''' | ||
* '''Would [[damaten]] be sufficient?''' | * '''Would [[damaten]] be sufficient?''' | ||
::[http://tenhou.net/0/?log=2014081313gm-0089-0000-16dea257&tw=1 Answer] | |||
::For the first two hands, riichi was not called as the hands were valued enough without the riichi call. A call for riichi in either example produces minimal gain for the risk of riichi. | |||
* '''Can the hand be improved by drawing particular tiles?''' | * '''Can the hand be improved by drawing particular tiles?''' | ||
* '''How many tiles are available for winning?''' | * '''How many tiles are available for winning?''' | ||
Line 128: | Line 130: | ||
* '''How many tile draws are left?''' | * '''How many tile draws are left?''' | ||
* '''Does the hand require riichi to end the game, while in the preferred position (1st - 3rd)?''' | * '''Does the hand require riichi to end the game, while in the preferred position (1st - 3rd)?''' | ||
::[http://tenhou.net/0/?log=2014081513gm-0089-0000-aba022ec&tw=3 Answer | ::[http://tenhou.net/0/?log=2014081513gm-0089-0000-aba022ec&tw=3 Answer] | ||
::Riichi was called here, as the hand is able to end the game by sending a player into negative. Yet, the position of 2nd is retained. | ::Riichi was called here, as the hand is able to end the game by sending a player into negative. Yet, the position of 2nd is retained. | ||