Situational analysis: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
When performing '''situational analysis''', a player accounts for important game conditions, namely the [[Ba|game round]] and the current scores. Because your final placement (1st/2nd/etc.) is often important in riichi mahjong, players should act differently the conditions change. For example, a player with a huge lead may not want to [[riichi]], but a player far behind may be desparate to riichi.
When performing '''situational analysis''', a player accounts for the [[Ba|game round]] and each players' current score to determine their decisions.


==Overview==
In riichi mahjong, your final placement (1st/2nd/etc.) is often important. Due to the [[oka and uma]] systems, you can gain huge bonuses or penalties when changing place. In competitive environments, your placement can be important for gaining rating points. Therefore, players should act differently as the overall conditions change. For example, when given the exact same hand, a player with a huge lead might not want to [[riichi]], but a player far behind may be desperate to riichi. Therefore, it is not only important to look at your own hand, but both your and your opponents' current points as well.
In riichi mahjong, your placement often matters. Due to the [[oka and uma]] systems, you can gain huge bonuses/penalties when rising/falling down a place. For competitive play, your placement may also matter for your overall rating.


== Hand values ==
== Hand values ==
Line 18: Line 17:
*Majsoul: If a Saint 1 player plays in Jade Room, they get 125/60/-5/-255 rank points for placing 1st through 4th, respectively (counting [[uma]]).
*Majsoul: If a Saint 1 player plays in Jade Room, they get 125/60/-5/-255 rank points for placing 1st through 4th, respectively (counting [[uma]]).


Say you are playing at Majsoul. If you currently 3rd and doing something has a 50% chance to be 2nd, but a 50% chance to be 4th, don't do it. If it succeeds, you'd only get 65 points, but if it fails you lose a significant -255 points. Even if you had a 50% for 2nd / 25% to be 4th, it is an unwise decision.
Say you are playing at Majsoul. If you currently 3rd and doing an action has a 50% chance to be 2nd, but a 50% chance to be 4th, don't do it. If it succeeds, you'd only get 65 points, but if it fails you lose a significant -255 points. Even if you had a 50% chance for 1st, and a 25% chance for 4th, it is still a net negative.


It is important to restate that an extreme level of 4th place avoidance only applies when you are at a high rank. At lower levels, it is best to improve on ''average placement'' (including fundamentals like [[tile efficiency]] and [[defense]]) rather than focus on avoiding 4th specifically. At these high ranks, do what you can to avoid being last - try not to take risks late in the game, even if there is no immediate threat of being 4th.
It is important to restate that an extreme level of 4th place avoidance only applies when you are at a high rank. At lower levels, it is best to improve on ''average placement'' (including fundamentals like [[tile efficiency]] and [[defense]]) rather than focus on avoiding 4th specifically. At these high ranks, do what you can to avoid being last - try not to take risks late in the game, even if there is no immediate threat of being 4th.
695

edits