Bureaucrats, checkuser, Administrators
10,011
edits
Karaten: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Quirks: Needs verification
No edit summary |
m (→Quirks: Needs verification) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
===Quirks=== | ===Quirks=== | ||
* On Ron2, there has been an instance of a person being able to call riichi with a gutshot wait shape for a 6-pin when they have made a closed kan of 6-pin already. The hand was considered noten, but did not trigger a chombo penalty (mainly due to programming assuming no one could do something that could be viewed as faulty). This conforms to the usual '''keishiki tenpai''' interpretation that the hand was not in a valid tenpai shape when it came to scoring a drawn hand, but not okay for determining if a player was legally allowed to declare [[riichi]]. | * On Ron2, there has been an instance of a person being able to call riichi with a gutshot wait shape for a 6-pin when they have made a closed kan of 6-pin already. The hand was considered noten, but did not trigger a chombo penalty (mainly due to programming assuming no one could do something that could be viewed as faulty). This conforms to the usual '''keishiki tenpai''' interpretation that the hand was not in a valid tenpai shape when it came to scoring a drawn hand, but not okay for determining if a player was legally allowed to declare [[riichi]]. | ||
* On Tenhou, there have been reports of a hand containing 12s44466688p with a kan of 3s, scored as in tenpai. This does not conform to the usual '''keishiki tenpai standard''' | * On Tenhou, there have been reports of a hand containing 12s44466688p with a kan of 3s, scored as in tenpai. This does not conform to the usual '''keishiki tenpai standard'''. All hands that conform to '''keishiki tenpai''' are valid, as well as a few (such as the current case) that may not be. | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
[[Category:Terminology]] | [[Category:Terminology]] | ||