Talk:Daburu riichi: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Tile Calls: new section
(→‎Tile Calls: new section)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
=== Nomi ===
=== Nomi ===
* http://tenhou.net/0/?log=2015083117gm-0089-0000-98b604ed&tw=1&ts=2
* http://tenhou.net/0/?log=2015083117gm-0089-0000-98b604ed&tw=1&ts=2
== Tile Calls ==
Previous versions of the page claim that double riichi is invalid if a "tile call [would] interrupt the turn order before" before the riichi declaration. This would imply that chi calls would never interrupt double riichi, and pon calls to a player's kamicha would also not interrupt the yaku. However:
*[[Tenhou and chiihou]] state that chiihou can "be denied by any tile call made prior to the first draw", which implies that chi disrupts the yakuman. Also, [[ippatsu]] is denied if chi is called. From common sense, if chi disrupts chiihou and ippatsu, it would also disrupt double riichi.
*[[Tenhou rules]] and [[Majsoul#Rules]] both state that calling [[kita]] interrupts double riichi. Kita does not interrupt turn order, so this violates the above definition.
*In addition to the online clients, [https://static1.squarespace.com/static/634a7884c297a25f06589b79/t/636136c78306ca6579c03fd0/1667315409318/WRC_Rules_2022_20220708_site.pdf WRC 2022 rules] states that kan (which does not affect turn order) disrupts the yaku.
I think this amount of proof is more than enough to show that, in many rulesets, chi/own kan/kita will disrupt doublerii. Maybe there's some house rules i'm missing here.
1,758

edits

Navigation menu