Suji: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
rw the top sentence again
m (→‎Basic Theory: explicitly state that half suji is not safer)
m (rw the top sentence again)
Line 4: Line 4:


==Basic Theory==
==Basic Theory==
In short: a tile become safer against an opponent ''if'' they have discarded every same-suit tile that is 3-apart from said tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)
In short: a tile becomes safer against an opponent if they've discarded every tile that is an interval of 3 from that tile. For example, if an opponent had discarded a 4, then both 1 and 7 of the same suit are safer. If an opponent discarded both 1 and 7, then the 4 becomes safer. (If an opponent had only discarded a 1, the 4 is not much safer.)


The explanation is as follows:
The explanation is as follows:
1,714

edits

Navigation menu