1,741
edits
Sekinin barai: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
(re-organize the page) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Sekinin barai''' {{kana|責任払い}}, or the rule of '''pao''' {{kana|パオ}}, is a liability payment imposed when a player confirms another player's [[yaku]]/[[yakuman]]. It is almost exclusively used for yakuman, but some rulesets | '''Sekinin barai''' {{kana|責任払い}}, or the rule of '''pao''' {{kana|パオ}}, is a liability payment imposed when a player confirms another player's [[yaku]] / [[yakuman]]. It is almost exclusively used for yakuman, but some rulesets invoke this rule for [[rinshan]]. Not all rulesets use sekinin barai in the first place. | ||
== Rule overview == | == Rule overview == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
In this scenario, the discarder is liable for sekinin barai if the yakuman-holder wins their current hand. | In this scenario, the discarder is liable for sekinin barai if the yakuman-holder wins their current hand. | ||
Not all yakuman cause sekinin barai. The | Not all yakuman cause sekinin barai. The yakuman that can cause seknin barai varies by ruleset. ([[#Yakuman affected by sekinin barai|See below]] for a list.) | ||
'''Rinshan''' | '''Rinshan''' | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Nevertheless, unlike daisangen and daisuushi, the tile that determines suukantsu is not self-evident. It is difficult for an opponent to know which tile would complete the 4th kan. While a player may know which tiles 100% cannot be a kan, which tile exactly is uncertain. Based on the above reasons, the pao rule is not commonly used for suukantsu. | Nevertheless, unlike daisangen and daisuushi, the tile that determines suukantsu is not self-evident. It is difficult for an opponent to know which tile would complete the 4th kan. While a player may know which tiles 100% cannot be a kan, which tile exactly is uncertain. Based on the above reasons, the pao rule is not commonly used for suukantsu. | ||
=== | === Rinshan kaihou === | ||
Sekinin barai is rarely used for [[rinshan kaihou]]. | Sekinin barai is rarely used for [[rinshan kaihou]]. | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
== Judgement of liability == | == Judgement of liability == | ||
Sekinin barai exists to punish "foolish" discards that ensure a yakuman. | |||
However, when the last group of a yakuman is called for an open [[kan]], the discarder is still liable for pao. Even though the yakuman already existed without needing the kan, pao is still applied. | |||
To explain how liability works in terms of "the player is responsible for ensuring a yakuman", it is better to switch to the opponent's point of view. When a yakuman-holder has called for two groups of dragons, daisangen is not guaranteed ''in the opponent's eyes''. Once an opponent discards the third dragon, and it is called for a kan, daisangen becomes guaranteed ''in the opponent's eyes''. So, when discarding a tile used for a kan, pao is still invoked: from the opponent's point of view, daisangen goes from not guaranteed -> guaranteed. | To explain how liability works in terms of "the player is responsible for ensuring a yakuman", it is better to switch to the opponent's point of view. When a yakuman-holder has called for two groups of dragons, daisangen is not guaranteed ''in the opponent's eyes''. Once an opponent discards the third dragon, and it is called for a kan, daisangen becomes guaranteed ''in the opponent's eyes''. So, when discarding a tile used for a kan, pao is still invoked: from the opponent's point of view, daisangen goes from not guaranteed -> guaranteed. | ||