Talk:List of chuuren configurations: Difference between revisions
(→Missing configurations?: new section) |
|||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
[[User:SomeDee|SomeDee]] ([[User talk:SomeDee|talk]]) 18:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | [[User:SomeDee|SomeDee]] ([[User talk:SomeDee|talk]]) 18:12, 22 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
: The main article in JP.wikipedia has a table list of them. I suppose, that oughta be copied. [[User:KyuuAA|KyuuAA]] ([[User_talk:KyuuAA|Talk:キュウ]]) 05:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:47, 26 May 2023
I feel like we should standardize on one suit to make this more readable. Coppro (talk) 04:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
- Then it would have to be manzu. It's the most "numeric" out of the three. Initially, I was looking to avoid the list from jp.wiki, but that's unavoidable. On my own, I ended up with the exact same numbering system. KyuuAA (Talk:キュウ) 07:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oh wait, nvm, I see what you're trying to do. I don't think that's unique? 1123456678999 and 1123456789999 both have agari and jantou 1.
Duplicate configuration?
The list includes:
1-1: 1123345678999m
1-3: 1123345678999m
Unless there's something I don't understand here, these two entries look identical, where 1-1 is a copy of 1-3.
Since "Agari" is the missing tile for chuuren, and "Extra" is the tile which has an additional copy, it seems like it doesn't make sense to have a 1-1 row at all.
When you start from the Pure shape, remove a 1, and add a 3, you arrive at the 1-3 shape.
But if you start from Pure, remove a 1, and add a 1 back in, that seems like it would just return you to Pure shape again, not the 1123345678999 shape.
So if I'm not mistaken, the 1-1 row should be deleted for being incorrect/duplicate.
SomeDee (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Missing configurations?
I believe that there are more missing configurations that are unique (not a mirror of another existing configuration) which would make the table look as follows:
Unless how you're defining mirrors is broader than just simple mirrors (swap 1&9, 2&8, 3&7, 4&6) in some way?